Kuk91 wrote:
Personally I just can't understand how can you write things like that. She always says what you can't separate words from the music and the way it sang (because those two elements could change the meaning completely). Yes, she works on the words separately these days, but there was a reason she made a song out of it instead of the poem.
Now, the voice she uses in "A Line In The Sand" - don't you think it suggests some (maybe, false) naivety? Maybe that's a mockery of Western point of view, how the politics always trying to justify themselves (for example, how Tony Blair was saying sorry for Iraq): "we got things wrong, but I believe we also did some good" - like, Polly is asking "What good did you make if people are forced to leave their countries and live in the tents?".
Objectively speaking, yes, they not only sound naive as they clearly are naive - and humble - as well as they are honest, but that's what the worker believes, that despite mistakes, they 'did something good', that 'there is a future to do something good'. As far as we know, the lyrics are words borrowed from a worker in the camp. Not objectively speaking, the nuances and insightful interpretations on his speech are personal and surely they are valid for our appreciation, likewise, I can't be presumptuous to state anything about her decisions regarding her writing, but I think she left the worker's words as bare like that for the sake of honesty, just like she did to The Community of Hope, and if that is really the case, not only I respect her decision as I admire her commitment to ethics. The only problem is that her decisions are not a win/win case all the time, she favoured one thing and compromised another, my discontent is just about prosody, meter-wise speaking, and that is just my personal opinion as I said, one may have no problem at all listening to these simple worded verses or singing them along.