sallytbyml wrote:
What REALLY bothers me is that as part of their celebrations they made a list of the 200 most influential artists of the past 25 years and they didn’t include Polly!!!! To me it renders the entire list utterly redundant. Yes, some folks could argue that perhaps her earliest albums (which fall outside the 25 year review period) were the ones that established her - there are definitely people who discount the work she’s done after 1995. However, you only have to read the revised Stories review: “cementing her art-rock legacy on subsequent albums”. The number of artists included on their list who are influenced and indebted to Polly makes her exclusion scandalous!
(…and obviously none of this really matters and who cares what Pitchfork thinks etc but I’m still going to have a moan)
Yeah, I was kinda bummed out they didn't mention her but not really surprised - they're a very American-centric website, and their consensus seems to be that
Dry and
Rid of Me are her best/go-to albums. Which is fine, of course, they're entitled to this point of view as a music publication.
Also, the list seemed to be very much based on some vague current relevance factor and I'm sure Polly would have been included had they published something similar 10 years ago, right after
Let England Shake came out (which they waxed lyrical about). But she hasn't really released anything new in more than five years, hasn't toured since
Hope 6 and as a result has pretty much fallen from the critical radar lately.
Anyway, cool to see some
Stories love in mainstream music press, even if just as part of Pitchfork's clunky self-mythologizing effort.
